“Of this I have only seen one instance, and I conclude it, therefore, to be a rare occurrence; and there are scarcely any accidents to which the body is liable which more imperiously demand immediate amputation than these.” This is a statement on knee dislocation from Sir Astley Cooper in 1824, who is usually credited to be the first to report on these injuries (1). Similar sentiments were echoed by William Gibson in 1825 when he wrote: “Complete luxation of the knee was extremely rare and was generally followed by violent symptoms and even death unless treated by timely amputation.” To some this might seem dramatic, but it highlights the seriousness of the injury and serious consequences of the injury if not treated in a timely manner. Some of the reasons amputation was the treatment of choice at the time is probably vascular injuries, open injuries with contamination and of course lack of aseptic surgical techniques at the time. Despite advances in modern technology and surgical techniques, late diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries will usually result in amputation, which can be lifesaving, but devastating for the patient. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries is paramount. Interestingly, a recent study from Mayo Clinic emphasized the seriousness of vascular injuries when they reported that knee dislocation patients with concomitant vascular injuries had worse outcomes compared to those without vascular injuries (2).
Knee dislocation injuries were historically believed to be relatively rare and reported to constitute 0,02–0,2% of orthopaedic injuries. The true incidence of knee dislocations is unknown but probably higher due to challenging diagnosis. Furthermore, some knee dislocations can be misdiagnosed because about 50 % are reported to reduce before presentation (3,4). What was interesting was that the risk of neurovascular injuries are similar in patients presenting with dislocated knees and those presenting with reduced bicruciate ligament injured knees (3,4). This highlights the need for high level of suspicion and meticulous and systematic evaluation of these patients.
Historically, knee dislocations have been associated with high energy trauma such as motor vehicle accidents, falls from heights and farm/industry injuries resulting in frank knee dislocation (Figure 1). In the 19th century and early 20th century, the mechanisms of injury usually included a cart and horse falling on its owner, a man on horseback whose leg was pinned between a rail and the horse from which he was being thrown, and less often, some less dramatic injury mechanisms such as falls. With the advent of motorized vehicles, industrialization and sports participation, the mechanisms of injury have changed. In recent years there has been increasing focus on knee dislocations in the morbidly obese patients, often termed ultra-low velocity knee dislocations. These patients often sustain a knee dislocation during daily activities or a fall from their own height. The morbidly obese patients also represent a special treatment group because they have a higher risk of concomitant neurologic and vascular injuries (5).
Knee dislocations are complex injuries and are often associated with other injuries. The rate of associated injuries to other vital organs such as head, chest and/or abdomen has been reported to be 27% in high energy trauma (4). Fractures are also commonly associated with knee dislocations, reported in the order of 50-60%; and the rate of multiple fractures has been reported to be 41% (3). The prevalence of concomitant fractures in the ipsilateral limb is high (17-58%), and may influence the decision making in the initial treatment of these injuries. Patients with bilateral multi-ligamentous knee injuries are reported to have a higher risk of concomitant head, chest and abdominal injuries compared to unilateral multi-ligamentous knee injuries with similar mechanisms.
The rate of popliteal artery injury has been reported to range between 7% and 48%, and as high as 64% in cases of fractures, depending on the individual hospital reporting (6). Level 1 trauma centers, where the majority of patients with knee dislocations have high energy trauma, usually report a higher prevalence of concomitant vascular injuries. The risk of vascular injury is correlated with the degree of energy, concomitant fractures and the type of dislocation. Peroneal nerve injury is associated with vascular injury, and therefore presence of peroneal nerve injuries should be considered as indicators for potential vascular injuries. Merritt et al. reported that 38% of the patients presenting with common peroneal nerve palsy had a concomitant arterial injury, and 62% of the patients with knee instabilities associated with arterial injuries had transient or permanent peroneal nerve neuropraxia (7). This implies that vascular injuries should be suspected in patients with nerve injuries because of the associated risk and the difficulty in assessing perfusion in patients with nerve injuries. The threshold for vascular assessment with angiography should be low, because the consequences of missing a vascular injury may be devastating for the patient. Data from Oslo University Hospital shows that 5-6% of patients with knee dislocations sustain a concomitant vascular injury (8). Interestingly, the odds for popliteal artery injury were nine times higher among those with knee dislocations involving the lateral structures than other ligament injury types. Additionally, peroneal nerve injury was significantly associated with vascular injury (OR, 20.6; 95% CI, 5.3-118.8).
It is paramount to know the anatomy of the knee in order to understand the risk for vascular structures around the knee. The popliteal artery courses through the adductor hiatus, where there are fibrous attachments to the tendinous attachment of the adductor magnus muscle, “securing” the artery in place (Figure 2). The popliteal artery has branches which form the superior genicular, middle genicular and the inferior genicular arteries. In the popliteal space, the artery has relatively little structural attachment, making this section relatively mobile. It is the deepest or most anterior structure in the popliteal fossa, separated from the knee joint capsule by a thin layer of fat tissue (Figures 2 and 3). When it passes distally, the artery is anchored to the proximal tibia by the fibrous arch of the soleus muscle, thus the artery is tethered at this point, before it divides into the anterior and posterior tibial arteries. Because of the firm attachments proximal and distal to the popliteal space, when the knee dislocates, the portion of the artery in the popliteal space is susceptible to injury. Contusion injuries to the artery in this section can also occur if there is a direct trauma. Injuries can also occur if there is a concomitant fracture because of the close proximity to both the femur and tibia in the popliteal space.
Pulses are routinely utilized to assess vascularity and the presence of vascular injuries. The presence of pulses in patients without neurologic injuries and hypovolemia can be used to assess vascular injuries. However, it should be noted that presence of pulses does not exclude vascular injuries. The examination of pulses alone has been demonstrated to be unreliable in detecting vascular injuries, leading some authors to recommend routine angiography for a knee dislocation. In patients with abnormal or asymmetric pulses, an ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement has been recommended (Figure 4).
There are some limitations on the utility of measuring ABI, including cases of knee dislocation associated with ipsilateral limb fracture or hypovolemic shock. Furthermore, an ABI is not able to detect vascular intimal lesions that may lead to secondary occlusion despite an initial normal ABI. ABI of <0,9 warrants further examination with angiography because ABI <0,9 is shown to have a 95-100% sensitivity and 80-100% specificity in detecting vascular lesions requiring surgery (9). Standard angiography has 1,2-6% false negatives, up to 7% false positives and is associated with complications. However, the risk of complications with angiography seems to outweigh the potential risk of limb loss when the diagnosis of arterial injury is delayed or missed. With recent developments in imaging, CT angiography is preferred to standard angiography because of low complication rates and high sensitivity (Figure 5).
Vascular injuries require urgent treatment and when suspected, a vascular surgeon should be contacted. Further evaluation after performing ABI should be discussed with the vascular surgeon. However, further investigations in a hospital without vascular surgery care should not delay transfer and treatment.
Treatment of vascular injuries usually involve repair of the popliteal artery utilizing a venous graft. Fasciotomy is performed to mitigate development of reperfusion compartment syndrome (Figure 6). A spanning external fixator is used to stabilise the limb during surgery and is maintained for four to six weeks post-surgery to stabilize the knee and protect the repair. After four to six weeks, the spanning external fixator is removed, and a brace is used to stabilize the knee. At the time of removing the external fixator, manipulation under anaesthesia might be indicated if there is severe stiffness. In cases of vascular injuries requiring repair, ligament reconstruction is delayed to about six months.
Concomitant vascular injuries during knee dislocations are not uncommon, and require timely diagnosis and treatment. Delay over eight hours can end up in an amputation, which is physically and emotionally devastating for the patient. ABI should be performed in all patients with knee dislocations, and the threshold for CT angiography should be low to avoid delay in treatment. Vascular surgeons should be contacted early when vascular injury is suspected because vascular repair takes precedence over ligament repair.
1. Cooper A. A treatise on dislocations, and on fractures of the joints. Fourth edition. ed. Published for the author by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green: London 1824.
2. Sanders TL, Johnson NR, Levy NM, Cole PA Jr, Krych AJ, Stuart M, Levy BA. Effect of Vascular Injury on Functional Outcome in Knees with Multi-Ligament Injury: A Matched-Cohort Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 20;99(18):1565-1571.
3. Wascher DC. High-velocity knee dislocation with vascular injury. Treatment principles. Clin Sports Med. 2000;19(3):457-77.
4. Wascher DC, Dvirnak PC, DeCoster TA. Knee dislocation: initial assessment and implications for treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(7):525-9.
5. Werner BC, Gwathmey FW, Jr., Higgins ST, Hart JM, Miller MD. Ultra-low velocity knee dislocations: patient characteristics, complications, and outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):358-63.
6. Good L, Johnson RJ. The Dislocated Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3(5):284-92.
7. Merritt AL, Wahl C. Initial assessment of the acute and chronic multiple-ligament injured (dislocated) knee. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2011;19(2):93-103
8. Moatshe G, Dornan G, Loken S, Ludvigsen TC, LaPrade RF, Engebretsen L. Knee Dislocations Demographics and Associated injuries: A Prospective Review of 303 Patients. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(5):2325967117706521
9. Mills WJ, Barei DP, McNair P. The value of the ankle-brachial index for diagnosing arterial injury after knee dislocation: a prospective study. J Trauma. 2004;56(6):1261-5.